2011年10月4日 星期二

Yahoo! News: Internet News: One last iPhone rumor: A Sprint-exclusive iPhone 5? (Appolicious)

Yahoo! News: Internet News
Internet News // via fulltextrssfeed.com
One last iPhone rumor: A Sprint-exclusive iPhone 5? (Appolicious)
Oct 4th 2011, 12:51

Posted October 4, 2011 7:51am by Phil Hornshaw Tags: iPhone, Apple, Sprint

With just hours remaining between us and Apple's big iPhone announcement in Cupertino, California, there's just enough time for the Internet to run off one more crazy rumor.

Today's crazy rumor: Sprint is getting the iPhone 5 exclusively (for a time, anyway), while the other carriers get the iPhone 4S.

Insane, right? It sounds that way to me, but considering that the Wall Street Journal is the source of at least part of this rumor – and that it's reporting the deal between Sprint and Apple is costing Sprint an estimated $20 billion – there might be something to it.

According to the WSJ story, Sprint is betting the farm on getting the iPhone 5 in its stable. With it, the No. 3 carrier hopes to revitalize itself, bringing in new customers and poaching them from Verizon and AT&T, which have enjoyed the iPhone for most of this year and since it was released, respectively. The WSJ reports that Sprint has committed to buying 30.5 million iPhones during the next four years, and it'll be 2014 before the cellular carrier turns a profit on the iPhones (not to mention that if the iPhones don't sell, Sprint is still stuck with them).

As TechCrunch points out, that's a huge investment for Sprint, but one that the company's board of directors has reportedly agreed to. The iPhone has been strong for both AT&T and Verizon, with the latter claiming the release of the CDMA iPhone 4 earlier this year set records for its phone sales. Sprint is banking on success with a subset of its customers that has been adamantly calling for Apple's device, and it is committed to offering unlimited data plans for its devices, something neither of the other two iPhone carriers offer any longer.

The Sprint deal story is out there, but not necessarily outside of the realm of possibility (although $20 billion seems too high for the company to be able to invest, even over the term of several years). Here's where it goes a little nuts, though: Boy Genius Report has a story claiming that not only did the Sprint deal with Apple happen, but as part of the terms, Apple is allowing Sprint to be the exclusive carrier for the iPhone 5. Here's a quote from that story:

I have been told that Sprint will be getting the iPhone 5 — yes the real iPhone 5, not the iPhone 4S — as an exclusive. And it will be a 4G WiMAX device. AT&T and Verizon would launch the iPhone 4S and get the iPhone 5 some time in the first quarter of next year as an LTE device. Globally, the iPhone 5 might be available as a 4G HSPA+ device.

That's a monster deal for Sprint, if it's true, and it might even make that $20 billion investment pay some serious dividends up front. It would help Sprint bring in a lot of customers right away, solidify it as a player in the iPhone wars currently going on between AT&T and Verizon, and possibly give it a leg up going forward. It's also really hard to believe.

Even at the astronomical price tag, itself a bit tough to swallow, it seems like Apple would be kind of crazy to basically torpedo its relationships with both AT&T and Verizon. And with Google's Android marketing system steadily increasing its market share, wouldn't Apple be leaving its loyal customers to get upset and grab an Android instead?

It's a strange thing to analyze, especially when you compare Apple's potential gains against that supposed $20 billion guarantee. We haven't got long to wait to find out what's truth and what's just hot air, but as far as this one goes, I can't help but be skeptical.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Yahoo! News: Internet News: Supreme Court rejects Internet music download case (Reuters)

Yahoo! News: Internet News
Internet News // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Supreme Court rejects Internet music download case (Reuters)
Oct 4th 2011, 11:16

(Reuters) – The Supreme Court let stand on Monday a ruling that a traditional Internet download of sound recording does not constitute a public performance of the recorded musical work under federal copyright law.

The justices refused to review a ruling by an appeals court in New York that the download itself of a musical work does not fall within the law's definition of a public performance of that work.

The not-for-profit American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) appealed to the Supreme Court. It said the ruling has profound implications for the nation's music industry, costing its members tens of millions of dollars in potential royalties each year.

ASCAP says more than 390,000 composers, songwriters, lyricists and music publishers in the United States exclusively license their music through the organization. It licenses nearly half of all of the musical works played online, according to the court record in the case.

The federal government opposed the appeal. U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli said the appeals court's ruling was correct and comported with common understanding and sound copyright policy.

ASCAP argued that digital downloads were also public performances for which the copyright owners must be compensated. But a federal judge and the appeals court rejected that argument.

At issue was a section of the Copyright Act stating that to perform a work means to recite, render, play, dance or act it either directly or by means of any device or process.

"Music is neither recited, rendered, nor played when a recording (electronic or otherwise) is simply delivered to a potential listener," the appeals court ruled.

Verrilli agreed. He said that the downloading itself was not a performance of the work and the musical work was not played during the transfer.

Washington attorney Theodore Olson, a Bush administration solicitor general, represented ASCAP in the appeal.

He said the appeals court ruling improperly narrowed the right to perform copyrighted musical works publicly and placed the United States in violation of intellectual property treaties and other international agreements.

The Supreme Court denied the appeal without comment.

The appeals court also ruled that fees paid by Yahoo Inc and RealNetworks Inc for licenses to play music on the Internet should be recalculated. That part of the ruling was not at issue before the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court case is ASCAP v. United States, No. 10-1337.

(Reporting by James Vicini, Editing by Maureen Bavdek)

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Yahoo! News: Internet News: Hunger strike takes toll on jailed Egypt blogger (Reuters)

Yahoo! News: Internet News
Internet News // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Hunger strike takes toll on jailed Egypt blogger (Reuters)
Oct 4th 2011, 08:10

CAIRO (Reuters) – A jailed Egyptian blogger, whose appeal against his conviction for spreading false information about Egypt's military will be heard on Tuesday, is in declining health because of a hunger strike he began on August 23, a rights group said.

Reporters Without Borders, which described Maikel Nabil, 25, as a "prisoner of conscience," said he was suffering from serious renal problems, anemia and scabies.

The group said it had written to the attorney-general in Cairo on September 26 asking to visit Nabil in prison but had received no reply. His family say he is only drinking water.

Nabil is serving a three-year sentence after a military court convicted him over Facebook remarks in which he allegedly said the armed forces had tried to suppress demonstrators who overthrew President Hosni Mubarak in February. He was arrested at his home in Cairo in March and tried two weeks later.

"This appeal is the last chance for the authorities to show a commitment to human rights, justice and democracy. The court must recognize that he was unfairly convicted by a court martial because of his views and his articles," Reporters Without Borders said.

(Writing by Edmund Blair; Editing by Alistair Lyon)

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Yahoo! News: Internet News: iPhone History: The Story So Far [INFOGRAPHIC] (Mashable)

Yahoo! News: Internet News
Internet News // via fulltextrssfeed.com
iPhone History: The Story So Far [INFOGRAPHIC] (Mashable)
Oct 4th 2011, 02:56

In a scant few hours now, we'll dive into chapter five in one of the most compelling stories of our digital-dominated era: The Life And Times of the iPhone. So for those of you who haven't been paying attention, and even those of you who have (hands up who remembers the ROKR iTunes phone), here's a recap -- courtesy of Thinglink, a startup that makes interactive photos and ads. Hover over the infographic to reveal pictures, videos and links from iPhone history. (The launch date of each phone is at the top of its screen.) Take note of the chips used in each iteration, and find out more about the real genius behind the iPhone's design. Wax nostalgic in the comments about your favorite moments. And get ready for a whole new chapter Tuesday morning, whether it's the iPhone 5, the 4S, or both.

[More from Mashable: Would An iPhone 4S Be Such A Disappointment?]

[More from Mashable: iPhone 5 Scam: Fake Apple Announcement Email Leads to PC Virus [WARNING]]

This story originally published on Mashable here.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

2011年10月3日 星期一

Yahoo! News: Internet News: Rhapsody Buys Music Pioneer Napster (NewsFactor)

Yahoo! News: Internet News
Internet News // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Rhapsody Buys Music Pioneer Napster (NewsFactor)
Oct 3rd 2011, 21:45

The legendary Napster is now part of Rhapsody. On Monday, Rhapsody International announced it was purchasing its rival, currently owned by Best Buy. Details of the deal were not released.

Best Buy will retain a minority stake in Rhapsody. Both Rhapsody and Napster were early into the game of subscriber-based online music services, both influenced the field, but both are seeing their positions challenged by newcomers.

Spotify, Facebook Moving In

In 2008, Best Buy bought Napster for $121 million, a point at which the online service's subscriber base was rapidly dropping. Rhapsody, co-owned by Real Networks and MTV Networks, is facing a new landscape that now includes Apple's iTunes, Amazon's music service, and smaller startups such as Spotify, Rdio, and others.

Spotify, a U.K.-based service that was launched in the U.S. in July, has become one of Rhapsody's most aggressive competitors. Users can listen to ad-supported music for free, or opt for a subscription-based, ad-free service. Spotify also recently announced a tight integration with Facebook.

In that move, Spotify is requiring every new member to also be a member of Facebook. While such a dependence on the social-networking giant has raised eyebrows, Spotify has reported that it is adding 250,000 new members each day since the deal was announced. That service now says it has 2 million paying customers over eight countries. Rhapsody, by contrast, has about 800,000 subscribers.

Rhapsody is also involved with the new Facebook Music services, although not with the kind of integration that Spotify has. Other music partners with Facebook, which could become the dominant platform for social-music listening, include Earbits, iHeartRadio, Rdio, Mog and Slacker. Facebook, with 750 million members worldwide, could dwarf any other platform for new music.

Napster Brand Continues?

In a statement, Rhapsody President Jon Irwin said the deal would bring "Napster's subscribers and robust IP portfolio to Rhapsody as we execute on our strategy to expand our business via direct acquisition of members and distribution deals."

Irwin added that the online music business is a "'go big or go home'" environment. It is not known if the Napster brand will continue in any form.

When Best Buy purchased Napster, the service had about 700,000 subscribers, a customer service platform, mobile apps, and an online store containing DRM-less MP3s. It also said it had the largest music selection of any online service. A new version of the service was launched in 2009.

Napster began life in 1999 as a peer-to-peer site that offered MP3 files to share, a revolutionary move that helped jump-start the online music scene -- and resulted in a variety of copyright infringement suits from record companies that led to its temporary shutdown. It reopened after it was purchased by Bertlesmann AG in 2002.

Rhapsody, launched in 2001, was spun off into a separate company by Real Networks in 2010. It retained 51 percent, and sold the remainder to MTV Networks.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Yahoo! News: Internet News: Internet Explorer Loses Market Share To Chrome, Safari (NewsFactor)

Yahoo! News: Internet News
Internet News // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Internet Explorer Loses Market Share To Chrome, Safari (NewsFactor)
Oct 3rd 2011, 21:16

Microsoft's share of the global browser market fell 0.92 percent in September in comparison with the prior month. What's more, Internet Explorer's market share has declined 7.5 percentage points since the same time last year, according to the latest data from Net Applications.

On the other hand, 22.1 percent of all Windows 7 machines accessing the Internet worldwide were running Microsoft's latest IE9 browser at the end of September, the web metrics firm said Saturday. The other top browsers running on Windows 7 machines were IE8 (31.6 percent), Firefox 6 (13.7 percent), Chrome 13 (13.1 percent) and Chrome 14 (5.9 percent).

Microsoft specifically designed IE9 to take advantage of the advanced graphics capabilities of the latest desktop PCs, laptops, netbooks and media tablets running Windows 7. As a result, IE9 on Windows 7 machines accounted for a 31 percent market share of the browser market in the United States last month.

"Microsoft has been pushing IE9 and Windows 7 as the best browsing experience on Windows 7 because of IE9's use of hardware acceleration and its integration with the Windows 7 user interface," said Net Applications, which is based in Aliso Viejo, Calif.

Leveraging Windows 7 Machines

Given that most people never change the browser that ships with their new machines, IE9's market share will inevitably continue to rise as more people upgrade to new hardware. According to Net Applications, machines running Windows 7 accounted for 30.4 percent of all browser users worldwide at the end of September.

However, IE9's emphasis on advanced hardware characteristics made it impossible for Microsoft to offer IE9 support on older machines running Windows XP, which was introduced in August 2001. Microsoft reports that IE6 still held a 9 percent share of the global browser market in September.

In China, for example, IE6 held a 28.7 percent market share and also continues to post significant numbers in South Korea (11.9 percent), Japan (7.1 percent), India (7.1 percent) and Taiwan (6.6 percent). Asia as a whole currently accounts for more than 42 percent of the world's Internet usage, according to Internet World Stats.

Elsewhere in the world, however, IE6 is tottering on the edge of extinction. In the United States last month, for example, IE6 held a mere 1.4 percent share of the browser market and also posted similar low share numbers throughout Europe, Africa and South America.

Chrome Uptake Climbs

Mozilla notified its browser developer community last April that Firefox would be moving to a shorter development cycle with respect to future releases. Under the new system, Mozilla can in theory issue a Firefox browser refresh at six-week intervals from now on. Nevertheless, Firefox's 22.5 percent share of the global market at the end of September was slightly down from where the browser stood in April.

The shorter development cycles are great for individual users, but corporations take a while to accept and implement a new browser throughout their workforce, said Net Applications Executive Vice President Vincent Vizzaccaro.

"This factor alone can put a ceiling on what non-IE browsers can hope to achieve in terms of usage market share," Vizzaccaro said. "Mozilla may be backing off of a rapid development cycle and [I] would guess that the reason [would be] to bring corporations back into their mix of users."

By contrast, Chrome's share of the global browser market leaped from 12.5 percent in April to 16.2 percent in September. Apple's Safari browser uptake also rose in September as is generally the case at the start of the annual back-to-school shopping season.

"This year, Mac share rose 0.42 percent to reach 6.45 percent of worldwide desktop usage and 13.7 percent in the United States," Net Applications said.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Yahoo! News: Internet News: Defense puts cards on table in NYC poker case (AP)

Yahoo! News: Internet News
Internet News // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Defense puts cards on table in NYC poker case (AP)
Oct 3rd 2011, 20:36

NEW YORK – Defense lawyers are trying to persuade a federal court in New York City that online poker isn't really gambling.

The lawyers say online poker companies merely collect fees to allow people to play against one another, using their skills for advantage. They say there's no participation by each website's owner, known as the house.

Their court papers say charges should be dropped against St. George, Utah, bank executive John Campos and co-defendant Chad Elie (EE'-leye). The government says Elie persuaded the banker to process money for foreign online poker sites. Both have pleaded not guilty.

The men were charged this year. The prosecution is aimed at shutting down the three largest Internet poker companies operating in the United States.

The lawyers filed the papers Friday and Monday.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions